Archive for November, 2008

Video: Senate threatens to detain Bolante

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

GMA 7 News Video:

http://www.gmanews.tv/video/32250/Senate-threatens-to-detain-Bolante

Credible tech in 2010 elections

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

Inquirer Video: Gordon wants credible tech in 2010 elections
WATCH VIDEO: http://www.inquirer.net/vdo/player.php?vid=1933

MAKATI CITY, Philippines–Senator Richard J. Gordon inspected the offerings of election technology vendors at the third day of Election Technology Conference. As part of the joint Congressional Oversight Committee on poll automation, he says the technology should be feasible and cost-effective to ease its implementation for the upcoming elections. In addition, he says early voting in areas such as ARMM in Mindanao could help decrease costs and cheating. Ambassador Henrietta de Villa, chairperson of Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting (PPCRV) says the conference helps inform poll experts to ensure security in the 2010 elections. Video report conducted by INQUIRER.net multimedia reporter Anna Valmero.

Cha Cha after 2010

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

Senator Richard Gordon, for his part, maintained that he would not dance the Cha-cha until before the 2010 elections are conducted.

“If we’re going to have Cha-cha, people must be part of the process… To be able to make people part of the process of change, it should be done after the elections, one. Two, during the elections, it should be raised as an issue. The candidates, possible candidates, would they be asked if they were for Cha-cha or not or what issues they would raise on the Cha-cha, whether they are for Con-ass or for Con-com.

If you look at the previous Cha-chas, Con-com was done by Cory, by people that she appointed pero who are not even known by the people. And we just simply voted. in 1971 we were elected but Marcos finished it and then we were just asked to raise our hands. There was no discussion. So the people don’t own it, we don’t own it. People have to own it, we have to own the Constitution.

The Constitution does not belong to the powers that be, it belongs to the people.

I’ve been consistent with that.” Gordon said

Privilege Speech on slain journalist Aristeo Padrigao

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

On November 17, another journalist was shot and killed in Gingoog City. Aristeo Padrigao was a blocktime commentator, radio show host of DZRS Radyo Natin and a columnist in the Mindanao Monitor Today. He made frequent exposes on illegal logging and other forms of graft and corruption in the city of Gingoog. He was shot dead at 7:15 a.m. in Gingoog City and died from a single .9 mm bullet in his right jaw.

Mr. President, my own father was assassinated and I hope this will be the last time that I would rise here but it seems that I’ve always made a commitment that when something like this happens, so dastardly an act, I am constrained to rise principally because it would appear that we have never learned, or we have never really pursued killers who kill with impunity in this country, especially judges, public officials, or for that matter, even the lowly

And so Mr. President, I rise on this matter again, hoping that it would be the last time, hoping that our policemen will finally take action on matters involving killing such as this.

Already, this country has been accused in the halls of Congress in the United States of America as being perpetrators of extra-judicial killings mainly because we had not been able to conduct any cogent investigation or for that matter, been able to arrest any of the suspects in these dastardly deeds.

Mr. Aristeo Padrigao was exercising his right as a citizen of this country, his right as a radioman, who take his role, seeing to expose things that are abusive and are certainly inimical to the interests of our communities.

Now Mr. President, this person, Aristeo Padrigao, was at the time he was killed, taking his children to go to school. A seven-year old child was with him and two motorcycle-riding men wearing dark jackets came by and shot him in the jaw and killed him instantly before the eyes of his seven-year old child.

Now Mr. President, what could be more dastardly than that, what could be more, so brazen in so far as our society is concerned? It is as if people of his ilk feel that they can go ahead and do it with impunity in broad daylight, in front of a school, in front of the families of these victims.

Having said that, it behooves the Senate which should be the forum upon which people can freely redress their grievances to their duly elected representatives such as us to move to finally put a stop and perhaps awaken our law enforcement authorities as well as our local officials to the fact that these killings must be contained. How many killings have been perpetrated using motorcycles? This is not the first time I’ve risen on this platform because in the past years, more and more killings have been conducted by people who are riding motorcycles.

We have filed a bill to make sure that people riding motorcycles should have a crash helmet and they should have a body number corresponding to the plate number so that anybody riding motorcycles could be stopped if there is no crash helmet with a body number. Unfortunately, it has been in the committee for so long. And I would like to awaken the committee concerned to perhaps take a look at that. Perhaps we can stop the killings if we create a way upon which we can take a bite out of crime, of making it difficult for them to commit these dastardly acts.

According to Uriel Quilingging, a friend of Padrigao, that the killing might have been due to the radio commentator’s exposes about illegal logging.

All of us rise here from time to time. We conduct investigations here. We’re not immune from the acts of these people and for that matter, so all the people who blow whistles on dastardly crimes in our country. If we do not act, we are encouraging in effect, these people who have no morals, who have no qualms of killing people in front of their families, to continue these acts.

My father was assassinated in 1967. It is now 2008 and it continues on and on, and so much so that it has become ho-hum to most of our people. It would appear that we just yawn and say, “These things happen. Talagang ganyan, wala tayong magagawa.”

We should not be willing to accept it. And this Senate should call in the law enforcement authorities and haul them to task and bring in all the list of all those people whose families had been killed so that they can explain what they are doing to make sure that people don’t get away with these criminal acts. And that is why, I rise once again to remind ourselves as well as the law enforcement authorities. We cannot just accept the statement of Supt. Leonroy Ga, Gingoog Police Chief, who said that his men were investigating reports that Padrigao had received death threats days before he was killed but found no other leads, except that the killing was related to Padrigao’s work. Anybody can say that. What kind of policemen do we have, when all they can say is “we’re investigating, we’re making a follow-up. We’re looking at this event but sorry there are no witnesses and we think it was related to his job that’s why he was killed.”

We must say no more. In fact, if the policemen of this country keep on saying that, this country has a right to start hauling the police chief concerned right here to let them know that the Senate of this country will not tolerate even the local police chiefs from saying “I cannot solve the case.” We must tell them it’s not gonna be business as usual anymore. And we should recommend that he be relieved and that the PNP chief himself explain to us what he is doing about it, what kind of programs he is doing about it to answer for all these motorcycle-related killings and public executions that have gone array in this country.

We call these policemen to task for taking P10-million out of the country. What is more dastardly than people who get away with killings when these policemen are supposed to be doing their jobs, making sure that they have criminal investigation techniques and they should be using the intelligence fund instead of using it for travel, they should have used that intelligence fund to identify organized crimes in this country, perpetrators of assassinations, guns for hire so that we can get these people to task.

And yet we heard the silly statement that day, “Ok na, bahala na ko jan. Pwedeng gamitin yung intelligence fund para gamitin natin pagpunta natin sa Moscow and spend the P10-million out there.

We can no longer tolerate this. I pray that is the last time I will rise on matters like this. But I’m afraid it will not be the last time because it has been my personal advocacy and the Senate president is aware of that, because as a young man when I was still in Law school, I went to the Department of Justice, at that time headed by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile. And while with my mother went to him three years after my father had been, five years after my father had been assassinated and continued with every Secretary of Justice at that time to try to get the assassins or the masterminds of the killing of my father.

There are people who are killed and they do not have the voice as strong as we have here. So we must speak for them, we must speak for the seven-year old child of this individual who was killed. He cannot just be a statistic, so much that every time I go to Washington with the Ambassador of the Philippines and I speak with senators, lobbying for the guerillas, for the veterans so that they would be paid. I would not be threatened by a senator and say “We cannot give this to you, because we cannot give American money to people, whose record, whose government has a record of having extra-judicial killings.

Balewala yun, ang tunay na sitwasyon dito ay yung pinapatay na tao because he speaks. And if he can no longer speak, no one is safe. If judges cannot govern because they are shot, they cannot make decisions because they are killed in public and you know that I have risen there and when we did, we were fortunate enough because when they investigated they found out that mastermind was in Muntinlupa.. When I spoke here last time, on an incident involving a child whose parents were both Muslims and Christians. A Muslim-Christian wedding occurred and she was the daughter of this wedding and she was killed. Somebody grabbed her bag while she was going out of her job early in the morning and she was shot. When we spoke, the policemen acted. But we cannot speak all the time every time somebody is killed. However, if we make sure that when we call the policemen this time and we ask them and we tell them that we would no longer tolerate the kind of “ok lang situation, wala tayong magagawa, bahala na, pipilitin namin magawa yan.” We must demand more of law enforcement, we must demand more of our community and our country. Let me just cite today the glaring statistics insofar as journalists are concerned.

Are we aware that this guy Mr. Padrigao who was murdered is the 6th journalist killed in this year alone. And are we also aware that he is the 61st journalist to be killed since 2001. Are we just gonna say, “hey, another statistic; another one bites the dust; another daughter orphaned.” A community that remains silent, and what do we have? A community that is deadened by fear, that is afraid to speak up, that no longer feels it can handle situations like this because “wag ka na makialam baka ikaw pa ang barilin.”

We must strengthen the resolve of our people. We must awaken their righteousness. We must tell them that there is a Senate in this country that will not tolerate this and that will do something about this. And let it be impressed upon our minds once again, according to a sage once upon a time, let it be instilled into your children, that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all the civil, political, religious rights. If that palladium is destroyed, if that palladium that privilege of being able to report on matters that are important for people to know, that their environment is being destroyed, that their trees are being cut by those who are greedy in this country. If they start becoming afraid, then we will have as we have had in past incidence mudslides that kill other people. And that is why this gentleman was killed because he dared spoke up like that.

And so I would like to ask the Senate to refer this to the proper committee right away. And so that we can call no less than the Chief PNP, and no less than the people who are in charge of Intelligence in this country and make a demand upon them that they must come out with a report of all these unsolved crimes in this country so that finally we could have some action on this matter.

I would like to thank our members of the Senate for having had the patience to listen, but I think this cannot be ignored and we cannot be complacent or apathetic about it

Thank you Mr. President.

Early voting and longer voting hours for 2010

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

Comelec chairman Jose Melo said on Monday they would ask Congress to lengthen voting hours and allow early voting for 2010 so that the Comelec could maximize the election machines they would use for the computerized national elections.

Senator Richard Gordon, chairman of the joint committee on the automation of the elections, said he would support both proposals and said he would file the bills in the Senate.

In his speech at the conference on Monday, Gordon said he was backing the proposal to have voters in remote areas vote using the election machines a month before those in urban centers.

This way, he said, the machines could still be transported to other areas and be used by other voters.

“The machines are expensive. I can only buy 10,000 machines so I’ll do early voting so that at a certain point, I can pull out the machines,” Gordon said.

Longer voting hours eyed for 2010
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20081117-172755/Longer-voting-hours-eyed-for-2010
By Kristine L. Alave
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 21:49:00 11/17/2008

EURO GENERALS HEARING: Military tradition of PNP hit

Sunday, November 16th, 2008

Senator Richard Gordon criticized the alleged “militaristic tradition” among PNP officers.

“[There is a] military tradition in the PNP na pagka matataas na ang gumagawa, oks na lang yan (that if an officer does this, it’s OK). Honestly, as a responsible officer. Do you think that that is the case? Because we’re trying to solve that problem here. And I’m beginning to get the impression na hindi pa naaalis yung mga sistema niyo diyan (that this has not been removed from the system),” Gordon said.

PNP Director General Jesus Verzosa admitted the existence of this tradition, particularly among senior police officers.

“As I see it, we still have the culture of the military that we have before. Some of us, especially the senior officers, came from the Philippine Constabulary, and we are slowly going towards the civilian character…Military tradition still persists…Pertaining to the seniority and we are trying to get away from that,” he said.

“No, trying is no longer good enough. As far as the people are concerned, trying is no longer enough. It must be a fact that the PNP should be a civilian organization; it is not subject to chains of command, it is subject to the law of civilians. [It is not an] uncontrolled organization that people take it upon themselves to handle the funds,” Gordon said.

Gordon also questioned why retired comptroller Eliseo Dela Paz was allowed to go to the Interpol Conference even if he was nearing retirement.

“I understand there is a policy that travels should be given priority to those who are 45 years old so that the PNP can benefit from the training and exposure you will get. But in your case, why were you allowed to travel on the eve, literally, talagang bisperas ng (on the eve of your) retirement?” Gordon asked.

Dela Paz could only affirm the travel priority policy of the PNP.

Gordon questioned the alleged “reward for cooperative conduct,” granted to Dela Paz by former PNP chiefs.

“Is this a reward for cooperative conduct from former PNP chiefs? Mabait kayo eh, liberal kayo magbigay ng pera. Magbiyahe ka naman. Hindi ka pa ata nakakabiyahe (You’re nice, liberal in giving out money. Go on a trip. You’ve not been on a trip),” Gordon said.

“I wouldn’t know, your honor,” Dela Paz said.

Gordon suggested that Dela Paz should have, out of courtesy, refused the trip since he is about to retire.

“Tapos kasama niyo pa yung misis niyo, tapos humawak pa kayo ng P10 million. Parang may golden parachute na reward sa inyo for your long service. Sige bibiyahe ka. Ganon ba ang sitwasyon (Your wife even went with you, and you even had P10 million. It’s like a golden parachute that’s your reward for your long service. Go on a trip. Was that the situation)?” Gordon asked.

“I wouldn’t know, your honor, but I was included in the delegation I would only surmise since the comptroller during that time is me,” Dela Paz said.

‘Puno, Verzosa should be investigated’
Gordon hits ‘military tradition’ in the PNP
By Abigail Kwok
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 16:06:00 11/15/2008
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20081115-172415/
Puno-Verzosa-should-be-investigated

Interpellation of former Department of Agriculture Usec. Jocelyn “Joc-Joc” Bolante

Sunday, November 16th, 2008

Gordon: Sir nung bago kayo napunta sa agriculture you were with prudential insurance, right?

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: What was your position there?

B: I was the president of Prudential Life Plan Incorporated.

Gordon: You were the president of Prudential. Certainly dapat napaka-ingat nyo dahil insurance yan di ba?

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: Kayo na-appoint kayo dito at sinabi pinili lang kayo ng search committee. And wala kang alam na lumakad sa appointment mo di ba? Samakatwid nilagay ka dyan dahil maganda ang qualifications mo, galling ka sa private sector. Tama ba yun?

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: At meron kang talent sa finance.

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: Meron kang talent sa accounting.

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: Ang hindi ko maintindihan ay bakit in spite of that, tila ba ang lumabas sa atin eh bibili kayo ng mga abono, magpo-provide kayo ng abono pero yung prudence mukhang iniwan mo sa Prudential. Naging very imprudent ka eh kasi ang lumalabas sa naririnig ko kanina pa eh tila bumili ka ng abono o fertilizer ang mga tao mo, o yung sabi mo sa baba, na yun pala eh hindi naman nababagay sapagkat ito ay for ornamental crops. Alam mo ba yun?

Bolante: Your honor, una sa lahat, hindi po kami bumili ng abono. We had no hand whatsoever on the procurement. Pangalawa po, as I said earlier, yung foliar fertilizer per se is not necessarily inappropriate, depende pos a purpose at saka usage.

Gordon: Andun na ko, but nonetheless, kahit na hindi kayo ang bumili, ikaw ay pinagkatiwalaan ng P728 million, di ba? Ang pinagtatakahan ko, yung P728 million biglang lumabas on the eve of the elections of 2004. Now, hindi ako magtataka dahil karamihan ng nakikita ko rin naman sa mga dating mga pangulo, nag-aabang ng pera yan para pag dating sa kampanya meron sila magagamit either kalsada, eskwela na ilalabas. In fact, alam nyo yan sapagkat kumuha pa kayo ng exemption sa Comelec para ma-distribute ito at nagkaroon kayo ng exemption. So lumalabas sa aking pananaw na talagang hinanda ito for 2004. Whether I’m right or wrong is immaterial. The fact is, yun ang nangyari. May perang sobra on the eve of the election at yun ay ginastos sa 2004. Now, having said that, alam nyo you commit a crime by commission or omission. Sa tingin ko parang commission yun eh. Para bang nagbigay ng pera na sobra na timing sa eve of the election, at pagkatapos, kahit na sabihin mo ang gumastos ay iba, tungkulin mo bilang a prudent executive na bantayan yung magpapagawa ng proyekto, hindi ba?

Bolante: Your honor, it is on record as you said, that the funds were actually released to us by the DBM on February 3, 2004. Therefore, it was not on the eve of the election because as far as I can remember the election was..

Gordon: In the eve of the election campaign period

Bolante: Second point is, as I have said this morning, we actually started talking with the DBM to release to us the unutilized funds under the high value crop and the rice and corn on September 4, 2003. But the DBM was not in the position to approve it immediately so we finally received the approval on February 3. But we actually, on record, requested for the release of the fund on September 4, 2003.

Gordon: Be that as it may, it was during the campaign period when it was finally released. In fact, you said 40% was released. Nagulat nga ako, humingi ka ng SARO sabay NCA on the same day 40% ang nakuha ninyo. Matindi yun. Kaming mga senador di kami makakuha ng ganyan eh. Secretary of tourism din kami hindi rin kami makakuha ng ganyan na mai-re-release yung SARO at NCA on the same day. Kasi yung NCA ibibigay lang sayo pagka-sinubmit mo na kung sinong bibigyan ng allocation di ba? Yung mga beneficiaries? Yung mga proponents?

Bolante: Not necessarily.

Gordon: Ah ganun ba? Bago yan ah?

Bolante: Actually, we could request for a lump sum release because as I said it is for an existing program.

Gordon: And it was a very urgent program di ba? Fertilizer is very urgent. So urgent in that particular year na doon lang lumobo yung requirement for fertilizer, P728 million. I remember last year or early this year meron tayong rice crisis, meron tayong oil crisis, nagmahal ang fertilizer pero wala akong nakitang urgent na move para tulungan ang mga tao sa fertilizer. Pero on that particular year 2003, on the eve of 2004 election biglang lumobo yung pangangailangan. And that was the first and last time. Before that walang lobong ganun. Hindi lumobo nung 2003. Hindi lumobo nung 2005. Nung 2004 lang nag-balloon yung fertilizer requirement, hindi po ba?

Bolante: Your honor, as I said it was not intended merely for fertilizers. As far as the DA is concerned, we opened the use of the fund for any farm input.

Gordon: It doesn’t matter. Kahit na ano pa ang hatian mo ng fertilizer at other input, the point is ang pinakamalaking component nun ay fertilizer at ang fertilizer na ginamit nyo ay liquid at ang fertilizer na ginamit nyo ay isa lang ang supplier sa kabila ng napakaraming supplier. At ang fertilizer na ginamit nyo ay hindi naaangkop para sa rice. Sapagkat unang una ang stalks ng rice eh pag nilagay mo ang tubig dun tutulo yun sa baba. Eh hindi naman dapat ganun ang paglagay ng fertilizer. I don’t have a green thumb. But the point is, bilang isang executive ng isang malaking kumpanya na ginagalang sa Pilipinas at bilang isang magiging kandidato ng president ng International Rotary Club, I would imagine that you have enough experience na pangangalagaan mo, you would exercise the necessary diligence in spending the people’s money even though this coincidence, na pinalalabas mong coincidence na nagkaroon ng malaking requirement ng fertilizer, dapat in-exercise mo yung pagka-presidente mo noong araw ng Prudential. Ang nakikita ko salat yung exercise mo nung prudence na kinakailangan.

Bolante: Your honor, the choice of the fertilizer was not of the DA. It only came out later when we came to know, based on the reports, that much of the fund was reportedly used for the fertilizer.

Gordon: Alam nyo sir, nakakagulat. Nakakagulat, sabi nyo bigla na lang kayo nagulat panay fertilizer. Pero mas nakakgulat isa lang ang brand.

Bolante: There’s no way for me to tell that, your honor.

Gordon: Ako rin eh. Doon din ako nagtataka. So coincidental naman na isang brand lang at pare-parehong liquid lamang ang ilalagay. Nakakagulat talaga yun. Sobra sobra no. Siguro kung minsan ang tingin nyo sa amin mababa ang intelligence pero di naman ako papayag, nag-aral din naman ako maging abogado. Di naman ako papayag na panay coincidence yang sinasabi natin, especially coming from somebody that I look up to, magiging presidente ng International Rotary Club, naging presidente ng Prudential. Ang nakita ko nagkulang tayo sa tinatawag na attention sa ating duty na prudence required of an executive, the due diligence required when you handle public funds because a public office is a public trust, and so much trust is given to an undersecretary na yung iyong secretary binigyan ka pa ng authority na below five million ikaw ang pipirma, di ba?

Bolante: Your honor, we are not even certain of the information that only one brand was use. We are not even certain that only one supplier was involved.

Gordon: Are you saying that the COA is wrong?

Bolante: I think that is something you must examine.

Gordon: In-examine na and you were measured although you were not here. And you were found one thing, because the COA, talo ka sa COA. Dumaan sa Senate investigation talo ka rin because sinabi hindi mo ginamit nga yung dapat na ginamit mong liderato. Hindi naman siguro lahat ng tao nagkamali at ikaw lang ang tama.

Bolante: Your honor I have not really read the COA report fully but based on the information given to me by Mr. Montes, the COA did not say that only one supplier was involved for all the 181. I think, COA got samples and on the samples used by COA there appears to be one or two or three suppliers involved.

Gordon: Meron nga pero ang pinakamarami yung Feshan. At saka hindi po ba nyo alam, hindi ba kayo nagulat 1,250%. At hindi nyo pwedeng sabihin wala na kayo hindi nyo alam, sapagkat ang totoo nyan pagkatapos nyong umalis sa DA, in-appoint kayo sa GSIS. Hindi po ba totoo yun?

Bolante: As a trustee.

Gordon: Samakatwid nasa gobyerno pa rin kayo. At sa lakas ninyo pwede nyong silipin, ‘Oy, ano ba nangyari dyan?’ Ang lakas ninyo, napapalabas nyo ang SARO at NCA in one day. Ang lakas ninyo na-appoint kayo na hindi kayo dumaan sa halos sa search committee, walang lumakad sa inyo. Napakalakas ninyo, samakatwid nasa GSIS kayo pwede nyo pang silipin, ‘Pare ano ba nangyari dun sa liquidation nyan?’ So that we don’t have to rely on hearsay. Like narinig mo ngayong araw na ito sinabi 91%, sasabihin mo liquidated na lahat.

Bolante: Your honor let me clarify that when I was the trustee of the GSIS I only attended board meetings and most of the time I was not actually in the country.

Gordon: It doesn’t matter. You’re still in the government. You’re still within striking distance of DA because that is a very influential position. Secondly, noon bang kayo ay nasa Department of Agriculture, did you have an office in the DA?

Bolante: Yes po.

Gordon: Did you go to the DA religiously?

Bolante: Yes po.

Gordon: Are you sure? Where was your office there?

Bolante: At the fourth floor po.

Gordon: Did you attend execom meetings?

Bolante: Yes po.

Gordon: Many timed?

Bolante: Yes po.

Gordon: Because there are some people who tell me that you were rarely seen in the DA, that you were really operating outside. I could always check the records there.

Bolante: That’s a bad rumor po that was given to you, your honor.

Gordon: Well, I always listen to rumors because rumors are like smoke. Where there is smoke there is fire. Because you know rumors are not gonna start just like that. Having said that, let me just ask you, nung in-accuse ka na, isa pang nakakasama sa aking pananaw ay ito, in criminal law, flight is an indication of guilt. At ang lumalabas sa pananaw ng maraming tao, noong pumunta ka sa America hindi ka bumalik at nung dumating ka doon sabi mo kinansela yung iyong visa at yun ang pinaglaban mo. Humingi ka na tuloy ng asylum. Sabi nga ni Sen. Pimentel nagulat sya bakit instead for asking for reconsideration on your visa lumabas you were already asking for asylum because of a perceived threat. Is that correct? Now ang pinagtatakahan ko, for somebody who is running for president of the International Rotary Club, which is a very, very esteemed position, there’s only one guy, I think, if I’m not mistaken who has done that, Mark Caparas, hindi ba?

Bolante: Yes po. But your honor, I’m not running for that position.

Gordon: But you were at that time. You were considered.

Bolante: Nobody runs for office in the Rotary International.

Gordon: But you were one of those being considered to be president. I heard that. I read about that, I heard that, I speak in the Rotary Club many times and I’ve been asked ‘Sayang naman si Joc-Joc, sana presidente sya ng International Rotary Club.’ Is that another bad rumor?

Bolante: I’m honored to hear that.

Gordon: Is that a bad rumor?

Bolante: I would say your honor that it’s possible people are talking about but I would not really speculate to say that�

Gordon: But even in spite of the fact that you don’t believe that and I’ve heard that many, many times because I speak a lot at Rotary Club functions, I have a lot of friends there, my father founded the Rotary Club in Olongapo, let me just point out na merong malaking kaso na hinaharap ka dito, instead of going back and saying I will rectify my honor, I will fly back, take the quickest plane back to Manila, you decided to stay for three years. There was no attempt on your part halimbawa, did you get your lawyers to ask for a deposition on your part para mabigay yung side mo dito?

Bolante: Yes po.

Gordon: Nagbigay ka ba ng deposition dun?

Bolante: As a matter of fact, as I told you po, I wrote on December 9

Gordon: But that’s writing a letter saying that you were going to come back on January 23rd. And when that happened January 23rd, hindi ka pa rin bumalik.

Bolante: Natakot na po ako kasi may bounty na sa ulo ko.

Gordon: But is the bounty more primordial to you than your honor? In other words, the stigma that is going to be brought upon you na nagkaroon ng malaking gulo dito, na ang sinasabi ikaw ang mastermind, mas malaki ba yun sa takot? Because all of us have threats. My father was assassinated, there were three attempts to his life. He never left his job, he went on. There were two hand-grenade attempts on his life. He continued on. Kung sabagay, relative naman kung ano yung tinatawag nating real courage no. But in your case napakalaking tama yan na hindi ka bumalik. Instead of coming back here you chose to seek asylum in the United States. I did not see any press releases coming out of the United States saying ‘I am not guilty of that. I’m going to come back at some future time.’ Wala akong narinig na public pronouncement on your part na ganun.

Bolante: First of all, as I said, I was afraid for my life and the safety of my family. Second po, I had a pending petition with the Supreme Court of the Philippines, I was waiting for the ruling of the Supreme Court of my petition for certiorari. And third, believe it or not, we tried to publish our side on the story but unfortunately, the stories that we asked to be published were not printed at all for reason I do not know. My lawyer they tried to allow himself to be interviewed so that my side could be aired. But unfortunately, even his interviews were either not aired or they were even spliced and they were quoted out of context.

Gordon: But sir, don’t you think if you had come back then instead of just now, many months or many years later, two years later, you would have more credibility and the Senate would have more respect for you because of you coming back in spite of the threat to be able to rectify or to be able to uphold your honor, instead of coming back now na after all these things na sinasabi na sa madla na yun ang nangyari. Kung bumalik kayo ng mas maaga siguro mas kapai-paniwala ang estado nyo, di ba?

Bolante: I agree with you, your honor. As a matter of fact, as I mentioned this morning, I would have even elevated again my US case to higher court and my deportation could have been postponed had I decided to do that. But finally I said, enough, I want to go home.

Gordon: That’s precisely the point, your visa was cancelled upon the request siguro upon the request of the Senate committee di ba?

Bolante: I do not know.

Gordon: Biglang kinansela yung visa mo di ba?

Bolante: Opo.

Gordon: Eh kung bumalik ka noon at ni-rectify mo yung sinasabi doon siguro baka bibigyan ka rin ng visa ng amerikano.

Bolante: Well I’m not really interested in their visa, I’m just interested doon sa sinabi nyo po that maybe had I gone back as you said, I would have been able to clear my name much earlier. I agree with you po and that’s one of my regrets in life.

Gordon: You know I really regret that eto ang nangyari sa inyo because sa akin ang nagiging conclusion ko, kasi we cannot convict you here. We have already made a recommendation at the Ombudsman to take care of your case. Siguro one of my recommendations will be to have the Ombudsman become an elected position kasi hindi lumalakad eh. So, in aid of legislation, wala akong nakikita dito except to advise future presidents not to appoint people who may have qualifications of a president of a major company who is supposed to be smart in finance but nonetheless very short on responsibility and accountability and is very derelict in his functions, allowing other people to take the blame rather than to take responsibility and say ‘I should have checked, I did not check.’ I never heard you say all throughout that ‘I should have checked.’ Because if I were in your shoes I would have probably said, ‘I would have checked.’ Because kahit na hindi ikaw ang responsible, you’re holding on to P728 million-worth of funds pero I never heard you say, ‘I would have checked’ because napakalaking halaga yan na dapat alagaan natin. And that is my problem. And to my mind, this is really a project that was not niche-driven, it was demand-drive. Demands by politics, timing kayo on the campaign period, which is done also, by the way, in fairness to everybody, ginagawa talaga yan, but on the other hand, it was really, nadagdagan pa nung hindi nyo chineck kung saan napupunta yung pera kaya napakalaking gulo ang ginawa nito. And talagang the people are the poorer for it, and our honor has been tarnished again and again and again and once again.

Support for televised presidential debates

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

Independent Senator Richard J. Gordon today supported the call by some quarters for the need of presidential debates on television that would enable the Filipino electorate to evaluate the candidates in the May 2010 elections.

Gordon lauded the call made by Pastor Boy Saycon and his group, Halalang Marangal, for prime time debate in major networks, at least for presidential candidates, as practical and sensible.

“That is what we need, an avenue for presidential candidates to present their platform of government. This way, the electorate will get to know the candidates and they will be able to evaluate their competence, integrity and reliability to lead the country and would not have to rely on surveys in choosing the country’s leaders,” he said.

Gordon has earlier filed Senate Bill No. 2079, which seeks to mandate major television and radio networks to sponsor at least three national debates among presidential candidates and at least one national debate among vice presidential candidates. Each debate shall not be less than sixty minutes, exclusive of airtime for commercials and advertisements.

“The debates would be very useful as they would help the electorate get to know the candidates. We will see the last of meeting the avances usually attended by candidates who are only full of promises but offering no concrete action plans. The debates would enjoin a candidate to prepare concrete action plans in consonant with his or her platform of government in order to weigh more favorably against the opponents,” he noted.

The senator noted that though the Fair Elections Act requires the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to procure free airtime from at least three national television and radio networks for equal allocation to all candidates for national office, there is currently no mechanism that requires nationally elected candidates to make known their position on matters of national significance through intelligent debate.

Gordon pointed out that in the recent presidential elections in the United States, the electorate gained an insight on the two candidates through the debates that were strategically held throughout the campaign period.

“Look at the recently-held presidential elections in the US, the debates helped the electorate decide on which candidate to vote for because the debates gave the electorate an insight on the two candidates’ position on matters of national significance,” he said.

Government must provide funds for poll automation

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

Independent Senator Richard J. Gordon today tossed the challenge to President Arroyo and leaders of the Senate and the House of Representatives to provide the necessary funds for the automation of the synchronized elections in May 2010.

Gordon, co-chairman of the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee on Automated Election System, said it is now up to both Mrs. Arroyo and Congress to make allocations for the P21-billion budgetary request of the Commission on Elections to enable it to implement Republic Act (RA) 9369, or the Amended Automation Elections Law.

“Let us put our money where our mouth is. Or were we merely paying lip-service to the Filipino people when we promised them that we are for modernizing the electoral process to ensure that the next elections would be clean, honest and credible?” he said.

“It might be expensive, but how much is our democracy worth? The law is there, and it is ripe for implementation. Let us live up to our commitment to the Filipino electorate by funding the full automation of the 2010 elections,” he added.

The automation of the electoral process is included in President Arroyo’s 10-point agenda, which will be implemented through the use of the latest technology for voting, counting, canvassing, transmission of election results.

“President Arroyo will be leaving a great legacy at the end of her term if she exercises strong political will now and support nationwide poll automation program. Our commitment to safeguard the sanctity of the people’s vote should stand firm,” he added.

Gordon said Congress’ continued failure to allocate the budgetary requirement has already caused glitches in the Comelec’s tight timetable in its bid to implement RA 9369.

In the poll body’s timetable submitted to the Senate, the budget should have been released last Oct. 24, the invitation to bid should have been published last Oct. 27 and it should already be holding a pre-bid conference last Nov.10.

“Our continued delay in providing the necessary funds will only cause further setback for the Comelec unless we provide the needed wherewithal to them,” he pointed out.

Gordon also stressed that the conduct of an honest, clean and credible election has been an elusive dream for every Filipino.

“If we fail, or even refuse, to act and stand for what should be done to achieve that dream, then we miserably fail as a nation and as a people. For that dream to be realized, the modernization of the country’s electoral exercises is a step in the right direction. The full automation of our country’s electoral process is a sine qua non condition for a vibrant democracy,” he said.

Reply
Reply to all
Forward

Senate Opening Prayer

Monday, November 10th, 2008

‘They will listen to my voice.’ said Jesus (John 10:16). How do I imagine that voice? A hectoring father? A nagging mother? A moralizing preacher? A roaring sergeant-major? No, it is the voice of a lover, who knows me in my uniqueness and calls me by name. Of all that you say here, Lord, your last words hearten me most: ‘I must bring the other sheep also, so there will be one flock, one shepherd.’

Today, as we gather before this august hall, let us be reminded of the horrors brought about by greed, selfishness and hatred which resulted in the loss of millions of innocent lives and which occurred during the early weeks of November. Let us learn from the harsh lessons that they brought.

On November 9 - 10, 1938, Crystal Night (Kristallenacht), in almost all large German cities and some smaller ones that night, store windows of Jewish shops were broken, Jewish houses were destroyed, and synagogues were demolished and set on fire.

On that fateful night, over 7,500 Jewish shops were destroyed and 400 synagogues were burnt down. Ninety-one Jews were killed and an estimated 20,000 sent to concentration camps.

Crystal night heralded the Holocaust where 6,000,000 Jews died in the hands of Nazis, 1.5 million of them children. These deaths represented one-third of world Jews.

On November 4, 1995, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Israel’s martyr for peace and a Jew, was assassinated by Yigal Amir who opposed the signing of the Oslo Accords, the intended framework for the future relations between Israel and the anticipated Palestinian state.

On November 11, 1918, The Armistice was signed between the Allied Nations and Germany which ended the First World War, where over 40 million casualties resulted, including approximately 20 million military and civilian deaths.

As humankind grows older, we long for unity, and for an end to the needless divisions that cripple us. Be a good shepherd to all who visit Sacred Space that is this Senate. We find here a unity in hearing your words and communing with you.